- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:33:11 -0500
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 07:16, Kendall Clark wrote: > I find many of these comments to be unhelpful, but we should probably > consider them anyway: > > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/view/182 "Some committee There are only 2 editors of the draft. And one of them works for HP, and might therefore be biassed. BRQL indeed looks a lot like RDQL." How many editors would they expect? 4 hands seems like the right number, to me. And I think it's a *feature* that most of the design happens outside/before the WG. I think we're doing collaborative design review, not collaborative design from scratch. I wonder if you share those sentiments and would please relay them, Kendall. I'm not likely to manage yet another account to join that discussion. Hmm... I might try to capture my thoughts as collaboration patterns, near http://esw.w3.org/topic/ConnectingAudiences -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:32:45 UTC