- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:24:04 -0500
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 07:16, Kendall Clark wrote: > I find many of these comments to be unhelpful, but we should probably > consider them anyway: > > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/view/182 The most technically relevant comment seems to be the "Compositionality in the bin" bit... I might phrase it positively as: please make the query language compositional or please add a requirement about compositionality I recall discussion of that sort of thing in Amsterdam, though I can't confirm explicitly from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf1#ucr I find the idea of composability appealing; it certainly sucks that XSTL 1.0 isn't composable; the WG seems to agree; XSLT 2.0 (and XQuery) are composable. Perhaps somebody in the WG would like to advocate this requirement again in light of the new information about these comments? Or perhaps Kendall or somebody could encourage that community to phrase their comments positively and send them to public-dawg-comments@w3.org ? more on other stuff I see in that comments page separately... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:23:38 UTC