- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:19:10 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-08-24 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/24-dawg-irc Scribe: EricP roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who regrets: Bryan Thompson PROPOSED: to accept Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0285.html ammended per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0287.html as a true record. I don't think these merit discussion: DONE DanC: evaluate Tom's proposed reply. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0284.html ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the drafts to the WG mailing list. CONTINUES. next meeting 2004-08-31. Scribe? agenda ammendments? 2. Review "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"? c.f. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0219.html ACTION EricP: read http://www.w3.org/TR/semantic-interpretation/ and let DAWG know what, if any, dependencies there are/should be. ACTION SteveH: read http://www.w3.org/TR/semantic-interpretation/ and let DAWG know what, if any, dependencies there are/should be. 3. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE. CONTINUES ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with respect to the provenance. CONTINUES. ACTION DaveB: propose an way to address the SOURCE issue. CONTINUES. 4. Reporting b-nodes http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_bnodes ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue. 5. XQuery integration requirements/objective ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol. CONTINUES. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa 6. WG meeting schedule ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. I found the date and put it on the WG homepage: 28 February - 4 March 2005 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#sched Shall we have a ftf in Jan? Who would like to host? note also: reconsidering teleconference time Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 August) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0275.html ftf3 agenda due this Thu, per W3C process. reading list? 7. Use Cases & Requirements done? withdraw these? are folks still on holiday? ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case. CONTINUES. ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy. CONTINUES ACTION SimonR: continue discussing and promoting union query for UC4.5. CONTINUES. ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R doc. CONTINUES. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 21:18:52 UTC