- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:01:24 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group ' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 12:57, Jim Hendler wrote: > At 11:53 -0500 8/2/04, Dan Connolly wrote: > >On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 11:40, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > >> Dan, > >> > >> If it comes to a vote on this, I am going to vote along the lines of > >> Jim Hendler and AndyS. I don't think that we need to added complexity > >> in the spec at this time. So you have my position on this. > > > >Umm... well, I can't tell what edits JimH and/or AndyS are proposing. > >Sorry if I'm reading too fast or something. > > > >-- > >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > Dan - I won't speak for anyone else, if forced to go with something > right now, my proposal would be to include objective 4.5 but remove > 4.5.1. However, I like Kendall's suggestion of leaving both in the > current WD and soliciting feedback during review - if we were moving > to LC or such I'd worry more, but for a next WD, this seems like an > appropriate action to take. OK, I think that's the course we're on currently. > -JH -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 14:01:39 UTC