- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:27:35 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Hi Patrick! > I do wonder about the lack of any treatment for arbitrary > typed literals. What would such treatment look like? Something over-and-above adding extension functions to the constraints? A quick sketch (and test cases?? ;-) would push the cause matter along. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com <> > Date: 27 July 2004 10:48 > > Hi folks, > > Just wanted to send a brief note saying that I find BRQL to > be quite promising, particularly its inclusion of the DESCRIBE > clause. > > I do wonder about the lack of any treatment for arbitrary > typed literals. I'm presuming it is planned, but simply not > added yet, eh? ;-) > > Cheers, > > Patrick > > > -- > > Patrick Stickler > Nokia, Finland > patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 06:28:29 UTC