- From: Simon Raboczi <raboczi@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:24:51 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-06 for review RDF Data Access WG telcon 2004-07-06 14:30 UTC Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 0021.html IRC: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/06-dawg-irc (not yet in place, but also available as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 0033.html) 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda Attendees: Dave Beckett, Kendall Clark, Dan Connolly, Yoshio Fukushige, Jos De Roo, Howard Katz, Farrukh Najmi, Eric Prud'Hommeaux, Simon Raboczi, Hiroyuki Sato, Andy Seaborne, Kevin Wilkinson Regrets: Tom Adams, Steve Harris, Alberto Reggiori, Janne Saarela Regrets for upcoming face-to-face meeting: Tom Adams, Jean-François Baget, Dave Beckett, Dirk Colaert, Steve Harris, Pat Hayes, Jim Hendler, Farrukh Najmi, Alberto Reggiori, Janne Saarela, Bryan Thompson, Dirk-Willem van Gulik Scribe: Simon Raboczi Scribe for first session of the face-to-face: Kendall Clark Minutes from RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0799.html (I don't recall or have it recorded that we ratified the previous minutes!) Resolved: no teleconference on the 12th or 13th -- next meeting with be the face-to-face on the 14th. 2. ftf update ACTION: DanC, agenda for 2nd face-to-face (confirmed that the f2f agenda is still running late: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2) DanC also observed that detailed agenda will need to be produced in order to make the most of the 2 hour teleconference window each day. ACTION: EricP, check with Rob/Network Inference if 2 hours teleconference facility can be organized on both days at 11am-1pm PST. (I don't recall or have it recorded that this was confirmed -- Eric, can you check me on this?) 3. Requirement: 3.6 Optional Match ACTION: SimonR, advocate "3.6 Optional Match" in an eMail message DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 0024.html A vote to adopt requirement 3.6 was postponed (again). 4. Requirement 3.12 Streaming Results ACTION: Kendall, update the draft following last week's approval of this requirement DONE 4. Directory Service Use Cases ACTION: Farrukh, write up ebXML registry UC DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ 0009.html ACTION: JimH, write up UDDI/Web services use case (JimH not present to report on this.) 5. Initial Design Poll Poll: RDF Data Access WG: initial design http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/ Current poll results with 11 participants indicate RDQL/BRQL as the favorite. N3QL polled surprisingly strongly, leading to discussion. AndyS and JosD didn't consider N3QL to be radically different from RDQL/BRQL except in syntax. No resolution was made to adopt the initial design before the next (face-to-face) meeting. AOB: SimonR expressed concerns about the XQuery-based languages using their flexible output capabilities to claim satisfaction of requirements 3.2 (variable binding results) and 3.4 (subgraph results) particularly with respect to programmatic APIs, and agreed to discuss it with HowardK on the list. ACTION: JosD agrees to send pointers to test cases to the list AndyS suggested a documenting a formal query model; no action arose from this, but discussion on the topic continued after the meeting. Meeting closed: 15:23 UTC
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 00:25:27 UTC