Thursday, 30 September 2004
- A blind carbon copy
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia
- RE: Test cases
- CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia
- RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-09-28
- Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement
- RE: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement
- Test cases
- Re: no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- RE: no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement
- Proposal to drop disjunction requirement
- RE: SOURCE example cases
- RE: no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- Re: Result format size comparison
- Re: Result format size comparison
- Re: Result format size comparison
Wednesday, 29 September 2004
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?] (s/model/graph/g)
- unsaid/not: any champions?
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document
- RE: A few simple tests
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-09-28
- Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?]
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- RE: DISTINCT (was: Re: Queries over multiple graphs)
- Re: DISTINCT (was: Re: Queries over multiple graphs)
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- RE: DISTINCT (was: Re: Queries over multiple graphs)
- Result format size comparison
- Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query
- Re: overlap between rdf query and WS constraints
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-09-28
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
Tuesday, 28 September 2004
- RE: draft XML query results format spec
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-09-28
- RE: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: DISTINCT (was: Re: Queries over multiple graphs)
- the query answer can always be an RDF graph
- RE: draft XML query results format spec
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- DISTINCT (was: Re: Queries over multiple graphs)
- Re: draft XML query results format spec
- RE: F2F3 notes
- Re: F2F3 notes
- Re: Queries over multiple graphs
- F2F3 notes
- Re: [jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com: Literal searching requirement]
- [jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com: Literal searching requirement]
- Re: Queries over multiple graphs
- query language abstract -- DRAFT
- draft XML query results format spec
- Re: SOURCE example cases
- rdf variable binding xml format
- overlap between rdf query and WS constraints
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Sep
- Re: SOURCE example cases
- FW: URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case
- SOURCE example cases
- RE: A few simple tests
- Re: Queries over multiple graphs
- RE: Queries over multiple graphs
- Queries over multiple graphs
Monday, 27 September 2004
- RE: SOURCE - simple test cases
- Re: SOURCE in N3QL
- Re: SOURCE - simple test cases
- SOURCE - simple test cases
- RE: Grammar for DAWG query language
- agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Sep
- RE: RDF QL name survey
- RE: Grammar for DAWG query language
- RE: SOURCE in N3QL
- Regrets 2004-09-28
- service name distinct from resource name
- Re: Grammar for DAWG query language
- Re: UC&R 4.6 use case and discussion
- formal defs from BRQL spec
Saturday, 25 September 2004
Friday, 24 September 2004
- RE: Grammar for DAWG query language
- RE: text grammar for DAWG ql AndyS 2004-09-20
- text grammar for DAWG ql AndyS 2004-09-20
- Re: Grammar for DAWG query language
- Re: Grammar for DAWG query language
Thursday, 23 September 2004
- Re: RDF QL name survey
- Re: RDF QL name survey
- Re: F2F hosting offer for January 2005
- RDF QL name survey
Wednesday, 22 September 2004
Tuesday, 21 September 2004
- Re: ftf3-brs minutes: pls review
- Re: ftf3-brs minutes: pls review
- F2F Hosting Offer -- Washington, DC, USA
- F2F hosting offer for January 2005
Monday, 20 September 2004
- ftf3-brs minutes: pls review
- Grammar for DAWG query language
- FYI: "Scalability Report on Triple Store Applications" from SIMILE project
- Re: sample query involving disjunction
- Re: sample query involving disjunction
Sunday, 19 September 2004
Saturday, 18 September 2004
Friday, 17 September 2004
- aggregation and stuff.
- Splice of Data Integration and Aggregration
- Re: rql implementation
- Re: Name possiblity - SPARQL
- Name possiblity - SPARQL
- name possibility: DART, Data Access (to|for) RDF Triples
- rql implementation
- Re: sample query involving disjunction
- sample query involving disjunction
- Re: F2F4 discussion from Bristol meeting
- Re: F2F4 discussion from Bristol meeting
- F2F4 discussion from Bristol meeting
- Test cases for disjunction discussion from f2f3 bristol
Thursday, 16 September 2004
Wednesday, 15 September 2004
Tuesday, 14 September 2004
Monday, 13 September 2004
- use case: content selection based on client profile
- RE: Fwd: namespace versioning (Dublin Core) use case for DAWG?
Sunday, 12 September 2004
- Re: Querying the Origin of Statements
- Querying the Origin of Statements
- Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-09-07 for review
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
Friday, 10 September 2004
- reading list for ftf3-brs
- Meet-up: Wednesday September 15th
- RE: UNSAID : issues in interpretting a query
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- Re: Fwd: namespace versioning (Dublin Core) use case for DAWG?
- RE: UNSAID : issues in interpretting a query
- RE: UNSAID : issues in interpretting a query
- RE: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- Re: UNSAID : issues in interpretting a query
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
Thursday, 9 September 2004
- UNSAID : issues in interpretting a query
- RE: issues list separated from BRQL spec
- Re: issues list separated from BRQL spec
- FW: use case fodder for xml output - mozilla templates (svg generator)
Wednesday, 8 September 2004
- some (actually 29) test cases
- Re: issues list separated from BRQL spec
- Re: issues list separated from BRQL spec
- issues list separated from BRQL spec
Tuesday, 7 September 2004
- Re: XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
- RE: XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
- RE: XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
- RE: XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
- Re: Access to date and time information
- Re: getting more concrete about 4.6
- Proposed reply to: Bjoern Hoehrmann, Access to date and time information
- Re: XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
- BRQL doc update : v1.55 for F2F
- regrets
- Re: Source and provenance words.
Monday, 6 September 2004
- Re: Disjunction example
- Re: A few simple tests
- Source and provenance words.
- Re: defn variable vacuuous
- Disjunction example
- Re: Fwd: namespace versioning (Dublin Core) use case for DAWG?
- Re: defn binding wordy
- Re: defn variable vacuuous
- XQuery syntax for BRQL semantics
Sunday, 5 September 2004
- Re: names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- names, elevator speeches, slides, and marketing
- agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Sep (in progress)
- RE: thanks for all the fish
Saturday, 4 September 2004
Friday, 3 September 2004
- Re: Bristol agenda: tests? reading? presentations? code? services?
- Re: A few simple tests
- Fwd: namespace versioning (Dublin Core) use case for DAWG?
- sort-checked definitions up to graph pattern match
- Re: defn binding wordy
- Re: defn binding wordy
- defn binding wordy
- defn variable vacuuous
- Re: A few simple tests
- A few simple tests
- RE: thanks for all the fish
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- RE: thanks for all the fish
- Re: thanks for all the fish
Thursday, 2 September 2004
- RE: thanks for all the fish
- Bristol agenda: tests? reading? presentations? code? services?
- thanks for all the fish
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
Wednesday, 1 September 2004
Tuesday, 31 August 2004
- f2f attendance response (Was: Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-31 for review)
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-31 for review
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- getting more concrete about 4.6
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Regrets for today
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: Syntax modifications
- Re: Syntax modifications
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- UC&R updated
- Re: identity management use case
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: Syntax modifications
- Re: Syntax modifications
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- re: identity management use case
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- RE: Syntax modifications
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 31 Aug
Monday, 30 August 2004
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 31 Aug
- Re: variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- "RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements" Call for Exclusions
- variables prefix - ?variable vs. $variable
- agenda: RDF Data Access 31 Aug
- Re: meeting record 2004-08-24
- Re: Syntax (was: RE: do we need INSERT?)
- Re: Syntax modifications
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
Sunday, 29 August 2004
Saturday, 28 August 2004
Friday, 27 August 2004
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- Syntax (was: RE: do we need INSERT?)
- RE: source, requirements, design [was: agenda...
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- how cwm does quoting rather than rdf:subject/predicate/object
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- source, requirements, design [was: agenda...
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- Re: do we need INSERT?
- RE: do we need INSERT?
- do we need INSERT?
- RE: Syntax modifications
- Blank nodes and variables (was Re: Definition: Graph Pattern Matching)
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: Syntax modifications
Thursday, 26 August 2004
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (design by committee)
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (design by committee)
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (programming language vs limited expressivity)
- RE: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (programming languag e vs limited expressivity)
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (design by committee)
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (programming language vs limited expressivity)
- Re: UC&R feedback from PL designer community (composability)
- UC&R feedback from PL designer community
- RE: Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
- Named Graph identifiers
- Re: Test cases: source of a triple
- Test cases: source of a triple
- Re: identity management use case
Wednesday, 25 August 2004
- identity management use case
- FROM vs. SOURCE (Was: RE: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replace ment for 4.5focussed on union query) )
Tuesday, 24 August 2004
- Re: Health care use case
- RE: Definition: Graph Pattern Matching
- Re: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- RE: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Re: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- RE: Health care use case
- Re: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Re: SOURCE issue - querying and retrieval of source
- Definition: Graph Pattern Matching
- RE: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replace ment for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Re: Health care use case
- Regrets for DAWG 2004-08-31
- RE: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replace ment for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- RE: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Re: SOURCE issue - querying and retrieval of source
- Health care use case
- Regrets for DAWG 2004-08-31
- a story of log:semantics and log:includes
- Re: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- SOURCE issue - querying and retrieval of source
- Re: ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Main uses seen for redland contexts for provenance
- ACTION: discuss & promote union query (Was: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query)
- Fw: action eric, look at Semantic Interpretations for Speech Recognition
- Thoughts on the relevance of Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition Working Draft
- RE: Language document update
- RE: Language document update
- Re: Language document update
Monday, 23 August 2004
- Re: Language document update
- agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Aug (updated)
- Re: Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- Re: Bristol F2F (Sept 16, 17)
- Re: Bristol F2F (Sept 16, 17)
- Re: Bristol F2F (Sept 16, 17)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Aug (in progress)
- agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Aug (in progress)
- Re: Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- Bristol F2F (Sept 16, 17)
Wednesday, 18 August 2004
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
Tuesday, 17 August 2004
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
- Re: Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
- Re: scribe for 17Aug? [was: Regrets]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
Monday, 16 August 2004
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
- RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
- agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004
- scribe for 17Aug? [was: Regrets]
- reconsidering teleconference time
Saturday, 14 August 2004
Thursday, 12 August 2004
Tuesday, 10 August 2004
Monday, 9 August 2004
Sunday, 8 August 2004
Friday, 6 August 2004
Wednesday, 4 August 2004
- UC&R working draft 2 published
- Re: non-agenda: RDF Data Access 3 Aug 2004 CANCELLED
- Re: 3.6 Optional Match
- RE: 3.6 Optional Match
Tuesday, 3 August 2004
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- RE: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- Re: ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- ebXML Registry UC (Was Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004)
- regrets
Monday, 2 August 2004
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
- RE: Querying multipl sources objective
- RE: Querying multipl sources objective
- Re: UC&R updated: 1.131
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
- Re: UC&R updated: 1.131
- RE: UC&R updated: 1.131
- RE: Querying multipl sources objective
- non-agenda: RDF Data Access 3 Aug 2004 CANCELLED
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
- Re: UC&R updated: 1.131
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-27 for review
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
Sunday, 1 August 2004
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
- Re: Querying multipl sources objective
Saturday, 31 July 2004
Friday, 30 July 2004
Thursday, 29 July 2004
- Re: federation use case
- Re: federation use case
- BRQL/Jena in public CVS
- RE: federation use case
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-27 for review
- Re: UC&R updated: 1.131
Wednesday, 28 July 2004
- Re: Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
- RE: UC&R updated: 1.131
- Re: About DESCRIBE
- queries in "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"?
- RE: UC&R updated: 1.131
- Re: UC&R updated: 1.131
- UC&R updated: 1.131
- Test cases
- Re: federation use case
- Re: Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
- Re: federation use case
- Re: Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
- Re: Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
- Re: Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
- Re: federation use case
- Re: Testing update
- Re: federation use case
- Re: Testing update
- Re: federation use case
- Re: Testing update
- Some issues around RDF Collections and containers
Tuesday, 27 July 2004
- Re: ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- Regrets for todays meeting
- RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004
- Re: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query
- Re: Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- Re: ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query
- Re: New requirement: disjunction
- Re: Updated doc: Extracting information from RDF for XML processing
- RE: BRQL and typed literals
- RE: BRQL and typed literals
- RE: BRQL and typed literals
- RE: BRQL and typed literals
- RE: BRQL and typed literals
- ACTION: a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query
- BRQL and typed literals
- Re: ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- Re: Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- RE: Initial details for Bristol F2F
- federation use case
- Proposed reply to Chris Wilper: Real-world use case for 3.10
- Re: Initial details for Bristol F2F
Monday, 26 July 2004
- Re: ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- Re: ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004
- Re: ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- Re: UC&R updated
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004
- UC&R updated
- Initial details for Bristol F2F
- Re: Testing update
- Testing update
- Agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Jul 2004
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: a MIME type for queries?
- a MIME type for queries?
Sunday, 25 July 2004
- ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ...
- ACTION: Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE (nee provenance)
Thursday, 22 July 2004
Wednesday, 21 July 2004
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review
- Some thoughts / thanks for Carlsbad attendance
- Updated doc: Extracting information from RDF for XML processing
- RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- Re: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
Tuesday, 20 July 2004
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: About DESCRIBE
- Re: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: About DESCRIBE
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- About DESCRIBE
- RE: Network Transfer Syntax
- RE: Network Transfer Syntax
- RE: New requirement: disjunction
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: New requirement: disjunction
- RE: New requirement: disjunction
- Re: New requirement: disjunction
- Re: New requirement: disjunction
- RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- Re: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Network Transfer Syntax
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: New requirement: disjunction
- Re: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
Monday, 19 July 2004
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Re: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- RE: Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Objective 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management"
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: scribe for tomorrow?
- scribe for tomorrow?
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- RE: Explanation of the Network Inference DAWG Strawman Objection
- RE: Explanation of the Network Inference DAWG Strawman Objection
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- Old use cases for disjunction
- RE: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review
- Objection to "optional match" and "result limit" requirements
Sunday, 18 July 2004
Saturday, 17 July 2004
Friday, 16 July 2004
Thursday, 15 July 2004
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- queries in the web (3.8 Bookmarkable Queries)
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- RE: Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- RE: Limited complexity requirement?
- Proposed XQuery requirement and/or objective
- Re: Fwd: External Storage of Queries
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- RE: ebXML RegRep draft OWL to RIM mapping...
- ebXML RegRep draft OWL to RIM mapping...
- RE: Limited complexity requirement?
- New requirement: disjunction
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: Limited complexity requirement?
- Limited complexity requirement?
- Re: deployment issues with fragment/range protocol
Wednesday, 14 July 2004
- Re: deployment issues with fragment/range protocol
- Re: Fwd: External Storage of Queries
- Fwd: Access to date and time information
- Fwd: External Storage of Queries
- deployment issues with fragment/range protocol
- Re: More on additional semantic information
- Re: More on additional semantic information
- Re: More on additional semantic information
- Re: More on additional semantic information
Tuesday, 13 July 2004
Monday, 12 July 2004
- Introducing Enrico Franconi to the group
- More on additional semantic information
- Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information
- Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information
- Re: BRQL spec
- no telcon 13 Jul
Friday, 9 July 2004
Thursday, 8 July 2004
- Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf agenda has details now
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- Re: XQuery on the agenda
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- RE: exact meeting location?
- exact meeting location?
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-06 for review
Wednesday, 7 July 2004
Tuesday, 6 July 2004
Wednesday, 7 July 2004
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- for room-sharing, Residence-Inn-residing late registrants
- RE: action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- Some tests: optional triples // first pass
- XQuery on the agenda
- Re: design eval matrix in RDF and N3
- RE: design eval matrix in RDF and N3
- design eval matrix in RDF and N3
- Introduction Hiroyuki Sato / Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. (NTT)
- Re: Real-world use case for 3.10(a)
Tuesday, 6 July 2004
- action item "to send pointers to test cases to the list"
- Free-form query results and result-set iterators
- regrets
- Re: IRC minutes 7-Jul-2004
- IRC minutes 7-Jul-2004
- ACTION: write up ebXML registry UC
- ACTION: write up ebXML registry UC
- Re: Connection RDF query to XML tools
- Re: regrets
- Connection RDF query to XML tools
- RE: 3.6 Optional Match
- Re: Yet more candidates for requriements and design objectives [w as Re: possible regrets]
- Re: An evaluation of TriQL
- 3.6 Optional Match
Monday, 5 July 2004
- regrets
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 6 June
- Agenda: RDF Data Access 6 June
- Re: RDQL + DAWG = BRQL
- evalutate TAP's GetData?
Sunday, 4 July 2004
Friday, 2 July 2004
- RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnaire
- Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-06-29 for review (v2)
- RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai re
- RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai re
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-06-29 for review
- Re: ACTION: write up ebXML registry UC
- Re: ACTION: write up ebXML registry UC
- Re: iTQL documentation update
Thursday, 1 July 2004
- ACTION: write up ebXML registry UC
- Re: DesignEvaluations page
- Re: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnaire
- Protocols : a look at the different approaches and draft evaluati ons
- iTQL documentation update
- RE: Yet more candidates for requriements and design objectives [w as Re: possible regrets]
- RE: An evaluation of TriQL
- Evaluation: XSRQL
- Regrets July 6
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-06-29 for review