- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:21:55 -0800
- To: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Anybody found any particularly reasonable places to stay in Amsterdam? My wife and I are going to stay on after the meeting and would like to find a B&B or some such that's relatively inexpensive. Howard > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Seaborne, Andy > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:46 AM > To: RDF Data Access Working Group > Subject: RE: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda > > > > > Likewise future ftf meetings. It's good to have > > them planned a year in advance. Anybody who would > > like to host a future ftf meeting should please > > let the WG know at or before the Amsterdam meeting. > > Perhaps we'll entertain proposals before the meeting > > in email and actually decide at the meeting. > > HP would be happy to host a F2F in Bristol, UK (when it is appropriate to > have it in Europe). > > The airport is: > > http://jena.hpl.hp.com:2020/airports?lang=fetch&r=http://www.meggi > nson.com/e > xp/id/airports/EGGD > > Andy > > -------- Original Message -------- > > From: Dan Connolly <> > > Date: 26 March 2004 18:07 > > > > regarding "ACTION: DanC to work on face-to-face agenda" > > -- minutes: RDF DAWG telcon 25 March for review > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0186.html > > > > > > Thinking out loud... the basic questions are who/what/where/when/why... > > > > Who is straightforward: as many WG members as can make it. > > EricP has set up a WBS form gizmo. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/AmsterdamDAWGF2F/results > > > > Why? To first order, the charter calls for ftf meetings, > > and each of us has agreed to the charter. To finer > > resolution, we should have some meeting goals... hmm... > > > > Where? to 1st order: Amsterdam. Beyond that, > > we've delegated to our hosts, Asemantics, who are keeping > > us informed on a web page, http://dawg.asemantics.com/ . > > We have a couple requests for remote participation that > > I expect we'll accomodate. > > > > When? to first order: 22-23 April. But we need > > more resolution on that... tradition suggests 9am to 5pm > > each day, but I haven't looked at flights and such. > > Our hosts are evidently willing to accomodate us > > for that time: > > "22 and 23 of April, 9.00 -17.00." > > -- http://dawg.asemantics.com/ > > > > Does anybody have a conflict starting at 9am on the 22nd and > > continuing thru 5pm on the 23rd? Please speak of conflicts > > for you personally, and don't worry about things you think > > other people might have trouble with. I'm interested > > to know about any sort of conflict, even if it's uncertain > > whether it will ultimately affect your participation in > > the meeting. Feel free to let me know off-list and/or > > in the comments field of the WBS form noted above. > > > > What is scoped by our charter, but we clearly need more > > resolution than that. And it's traditional to assign > > specific times to certain topics. I mentioned a couple > > 3-hour slots for the remote participants. These should > > be in the afternoon (a) because that puts the sun > > up over Pat Hayes, and (b) because Patrick Stickler > > asked to be briefed on the morning's progress at > > the start of the session. > > > > Meeting goals are also relevant to the what? and why? questions. > > I have only just begun to consider meeting goals. > > I suppose I'd like to get some level of consensus > > around use cases and requirements and have a plan > > for publishing them on http://www.w3.org/TR/ . > > > > Perhaps we can walk thru the RDQL submission > > and collect issues. Or maybe it's too early for that. > > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2003/SUBM-RDQL-20031030/ > > > > I expect that during the breaks and such, folks will > > discuss their favorite design proposals, or test > > harness mechanisms, and the like. But I don't know > > if we'll deal with that sort of thing as a group just yet. > > > > We have only decided telcon times thru April, so > > please come prepared to play telcon tiddlywinks. > > i.e. have your calendar handy. People that don't > > plan to attend should give their input by email. > > I'll send a separate message about that. > > > > Likewise future ftf meetings. It's good to have > > them planned a year in advance. Anybody who would > > like to host a future ftf meeting should please > > let the WG know at or before the Amsterdam meeting. > > Perhaps we'll entertain proposals before the meeting > > in email and actually decide at the meeting. > > > > There. That's the contents of my brain relevant > > to the ftf agenda. Let the discussion begin. > > Keep in mind that W3C process calls for the > > agenda to be done two weeks in advance, i.e. > > 8 April. By that time I intend to have a meeting > > page in place, ala > > > > Fifth Meeting of the W3C Web Ontology Working Group > > 9-10 January 2003 > > Manchester, UK > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf5.html >
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 10:22:00 UTC