- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:57:36 -0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- > From: Dan Connolly <> > Date: 23 March 2004 21:57 > > Recall we're meeting this Thursday at 15:30UTC > (10:30am Boston / 00:30am Tokyo / 16:30 Paris). > > What shall we talk about? Might be a good time to discuss (not "decide") the UC/requirements document to help discussions know what the inpout to the document will need. > > (this isn't the agenda; it's a call for input to the agenda.) > > Reviewing the minutes from last week for old business... > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0065.html > > I expect we'll continue these actions without > much discussion; there's no rush, is there? > > > ACTION DirkG: collect logistics details in a web page and send us a > > pointer > > > > ACTION DanC: set up meeting registration > > Then on use cases... > > Alberto did his action right away... > > thoughts and some refs about AFS-2 UC > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0087.html > > Discussion has been interesting, but I don't see > much convergence. (if you want to respond do that message, > do so in that thread, not in reply to this message, please!) > > > Andy did his action Friday: > > Use case: Find the email address of "John Smith" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0113.html > > That one looks pretty straightforward. > > Regarding this one... > > > ACTION KendallC: refine JS-1, esp the composer/creator version > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0025.html > > I'm not sure I have seen it. Kendal, did you send it? > > And I'm not sure about this one either... > > > ACTION EricP: send "tell me properties of X" case > > EricP, is this message intended to discharge that action? > > EP-1 - EP-4 including promised general metadata query > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0083.html > > > I wonder when is the right time to summarize the discussion > so far in a document. I'd like to do it at least two weeks > before the ftf meeting. But there are risks to doing it > too soon. As I said last Friday, > > Anybody is welcome to try to do some gathering, but at this > early point, there's no guarantee that it'll become the > basis of the group's work going forward.
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 06:00:06 UTC