- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:28:28 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:21:34PM -0800, Rob Shearer wrote: > Yes, the time and resources we'd devote to protocol are of concern to > me. Hmm, so, Rob, yr against any sort of protocol standardization work at all in the first phase (that is, before we have a DAWG-QL document)? I wonder how we finesse that given our charter? (Fwiw, I don't agree with that prioritization, I just wonder how you propose ignoring a big chunk of our charter?) As Dan has said, the charter can be changed, but it's requires doing stuff outside the WG and I get the impression that it's non-trivial. And, surely, we'd have to have some kind of WG consensus first, and I doubt that's going to be reachable around a move to pull protocol out or delay it till the QL is done. Best, Kendall -- Sometimes it's appropriate, even patriotic, to be ashamed of your country. -- James Howard Kunstler
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 16:30:07 UTC