- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:08:44 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 02:51:26 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > Ah, I realized what this was... I agreed with Dave Beckett's claim: > > I think 4.2 probably should be a (candidate) requirement, not an > objective. At least if it is replaced with something more specific > such as enabling the returning of the Source URI of the document > that contained the trible. > > That is, I agree that 4.2 Provenance should be a requirement. However, > now that I think about it a bit more, I'm not sure you can always give > a source URI for every triple; what about ones generated by inference? > > I'm wondering if anyone else has an opinion about this? We use bNodes (or something similar, a controlled URI space in some versions) to represent the source of inferred triples. - Steve
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 06:08:46 UTC