- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:37:02 +0100
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- > From: Kendall Clark <mailto:kendall@monkeyfist.com> > Date: 18 June 2004 18:30 > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > As do ours. However, our own local preferecnes are enough on their > > own to > > Presumbaly you left out a "not" here. Err - yes - well spotted. Andy > > > justify this WG getting involved. Some of the issues are more bound > > to registering MIME types and the time/work that takes. > > I agree re: anyone group. But there seem to be many such groups. > > I also agree about the problems with MIME type registration. I haven't > looked to see how many of the other serialization formats have MIME > tags or have registered for them. > > Putting URIs into Accept: will probably get us yelled at, as would a > X-DAWG-Accept, presumably. > > > If we can find a way to have an extensible "Accept:"-like scheme that > > used URIs then that presumably would meet your need for the design > > goal? > > Yes, that would do it, minimally. > > Kendall
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 13:37:25 UTC