- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:57:29 -0400
- To: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 06:40:20PM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote: > I think we're using "RDF" to refer to different things here. Really? For the most part -- no, in *every* case -- we store provenance information about an RDF graph *as* another RDF graph. > information), then it's RDF, but if it's meta-information sitting > outside the RDF data model then I think it's somewhat out of scope. I agree; but I'm talking about provenance info *in* RDF. > I'm glad we've finally gotten down the list to talk about some of these > objectives that have never really been addressed. Sure. FWIW, I probably wouldn't support 4.mumble Provenance as written because it's way, way underspecified. But I think we should have as a DO some kind of support for provenance. I'm not sure what that amounts to, though. Best, Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 21:59:22 UTC