- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:37:51 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
That's my expectation as well. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Jim Hendler <> > Date: 9 June 2004 02:53 > > Maybe I didn't understand what 4.6 was about, I assumed it was > something like this: > > if I have > a rdfs:subClassOf b > b rdfs:subClassOf c > > then I was assuming that the requirments in UC&R would imply that if > I query for > a rdfs:subClassOf ?x > then ?x would be bound to b > however, if we include 4.6, then we would be expected to return > ?x = b and ?x = c > > if I'm misunderstanding, please let know. > -JH
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 06:39:41 UTC