- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:21:56 -0400
- To: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:56:06PM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote: > > This is the intent I meant to encode when I proposed that objective. We > haven't adopted the objective, in any form, so you haven't voted on it > either way. So you were speaking for yourself. Cool. But since we have some new members, I think it would be good to avoid speaking of "we", when no such shared intention exists. And, fwiw, I thought *I* proposed 4.6 originally?! :> > If we're writing a brand new query language for RDF, in addition to the > one that already exists for XML, and then need another one for RDFS, and > then another for OWL, and then another for SWRL or whatever else ends up > in the layer cake, and so on and so on, then I think the W3C *really* > needs to rethink its architecture. Wow. Talk about running full speed toward the slippery slope...! Best, Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 18:23:48 UTC