Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:25:20PM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote:

> we strive to produce a query
> language in which *any* extra knowledge which describes RDF graphs can
> play a role.

We do? Are you speaking for the WG when you say that? If so, when did
we decide *that*? I would have voted loudly against it.

If you're just speaking for yourself, that's cool; but it would be
nice if we could keep that distinct.

Best,
Kendall Clark

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 17:42:33 UTC