- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:17:03 -0400
- To: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:45:54AM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote: > The problem is that this requirement as written introduces the notion of > "explanation", which is actually a *very* hard problem in general, and > is almost always more information than the user really wanted. As I said in the telecon today, I suppose that I (eek!) introduced this troublesome clause. I don't remember where it came from, and I don't remember why I would have introduced it. But it is troublesome, as you point out, and suggests something very different from (and much harder than) what we wanted to set down as a requirement. It'll be stricken from the next draft of UC&R. Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 13:19:18 UTC