- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:15:46 -0500
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 11:01, Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:23:51 +0900, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > rdql- : 4.2 Provenance > > True, but several (3+) of the implementations have added... That's very interesting/relevant; i.e. it is evidence in support of 4.2 Provenance. As I mentioned in the teleconference, in cases where we have an objective or requirement that's not met by one of these designs, I'm interested to know if the user (or implementor community) is satisfied with that or if they are agitating to change it. > a 4th member to > the pattern, eg: > > SELECT ?vcard, ?source > WHERE (?vcard vcard:FN "John Smith" ?source) > > will tell you the "source" of the statement. > > - Steve -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2004 12:18:40 UTC