- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:31:26 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 02:54:15PM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > I would be happier if we did not have any such requirement. Then you're already happier than you know! :> 4.6 is a design objective, not a requirement. > Suggestion (if we must keep this requirement): > > Additional Semantic Information > > It should be possible for a query to indicate that the answers should > take into account knowledge encoded in RDF semantic extensions, such > as RDFS, OWL, etc.. I can live with this version and like it better than dropping 4.6 as a design objective tout court. Best, Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 08:32:47 UTC