Re: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge)

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 02:54:15PM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:

> I would be happier if we did not have any such requirement. 

Then you're already happier than you know! :>

4.6 is a design objective, not a requirement.

> Suggestion (if we must keep this requirement):
> 
> Additional Semantic Information
> 
> It should be possible for a query to indicate that the answers should 
> take into account knowledge encoded in RDF semantic extensions, such 
> as RDFS, OWL, etc..

I can live with this version and like it better than dropping 4.6 as a
design objective tout court.

Best,
Kendall Clark

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 08:32:47 UTC