- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:25:17 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:13:09AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > changing graph. So I'd suggest that we choose a phrase like 'server' > (or 'source' or 'base' or 'answer' or some such) and use it > consistently as a name and as a qualifier, as in 'server graph', > meaning the notional RDF graph used by the server to answer the query. The problem with "server graph" is that we adopted a requirement that the query language can work w/out network support. Hence my suggested "queried graph"; "source graph" also seems a credible choice. But yr point about "*the* RDF graph", given the possibility of distributed or federated queries, is a good one. As is the point about naming and consistent use. Best, Kendall Clark -- Habitation creates space; space only exists because we do.
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:26:28 UTC