RE: Connection to ebXML registry work

> -Current submissions of strawman RDF query language (Are there any?)

A member submission:

http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109/

There are a number of implmentations.

There is a tutorial:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/tutorial/RDQL/

The WG has not choosen a strawman query langauge yet.

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 4 May 2004 18:11
> 
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > Our charter calls for a last call WD by Jan 2005
> > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#schedule
> > (though I have ambitions of getting a 1st version to
> > last call before then). Do you know if that schedule
> > is consistent with the expectations of the ebXML
> > registry TC?
> > 
> I believe the schedule matches up reasonably well. The
> Semantic Content
> Management (SCM)
> work is part of ebXML Registry version 4. We do not expect
> version 4 to be a
> Committee Draft (first publicly reviewable working draft)
> much earlier
> than Jan 2005.
> 
> I have already shared the link to the DAWG Requirements document and
> will solicit feedback in SCM SC and share it with DAWG.
> 
> Would it be possible for you to summarize a few bullet points on the
> state of DAWG work that I can communicate to the SCM SC. Here is what I
> have so far: 
> 
> -Formed in February 2004, has one f2f in April 2004
> 
> -Charter and history at:
> http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#hist
> 
> -Current submissions of strawman RDF query language (Are there any?)
> 
> -Schedule may be found at:
> http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#schedule
> 
> -Currently working on Use Cases and Requirements. Draft available at:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases
> 
> Anything else I should add? Please clarify question above
> about whether
> existing strawman RDF query language  submissions have been made.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > I looked at their schedule
> > (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=regrep)
> > and I don't see any milestones there.
> > 
> > 
> The ebXML Registry TC web site is lacking this and some other important
> details right now. We will work to get
> that sorted out.
> 
> Currently the SCM SC is working through Use Cases and
> Requirements when
> it is a little more stable.
> 
> The SCM SC would welcome participation or feedback in our
> work from DAWG
> and SWA participants. Thanks.

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 05:55:34 UTC