- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:50:54 +0100
- To: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> -Current submissions of strawman RDF query language (Are there any?) A member submission: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109/ There are a number of implmentations. There is a tutorial: http://jena.sourceforge.net/tutorial/RDQL/ The WG has not choosen a strawman query langauge yet. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <> > Date: 4 May 2004 18:11 > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Our charter calls for a last call WD by Jan 2005 > > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#schedule > > (though I have ambitions of getting a 1st version to > > last call before then). Do you know if that schedule > > is consistent with the expectations of the ebXML > > registry TC? > > > I believe the schedule matches up reasonably well. The > Semantic Content > Management (SCM) > work is part of ebXML Registry version 4. We do not expect > version 4 to be a > Committee Draft (first publicly reviewable working draft) > much earlier > than Jan 2005. > > I have already shared the link to the DAWG Requirements document and > will solicit feedback in SCM SC and share it with DAWG. > > Would it be possible for you to summarize a few bullet points on the > state of DAWG work that I can communicate to the SCM SC. Here is what I > have so far: > > -Formed in February 2004, has one f2f in April 2004 > > -Charter and history at: > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#hist > > -Current submissions of strawman RDF query language (Are there any?) > > -Schedule may be found at: > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#schedule > > -Currently working on Use Cases and Requirements. Draft available at: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases > > Anything else I should add? Please clarify question above > about whether > existing strawman RDF query language submissions have been made. > > Thanks. > > > I looked at their schedule > > (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=regrep) > > and I don't see any milestones there. > > > > > The ebXML Registry TC web site is lacking this and some other important > details right now. We will work to get > that sorted out. > > Currently the SCM SC is working through Use Cases and > Requirements when > it is a little more stable. > > The SCM SC would welcome participation or feedback in our > work from DAWG > and SWA participants. Thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 05:55:34 UTC