- From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 14:06:49 -0700
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, <public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org>
> Neither do I...
> I would simply ask the following RDF/N3 kind of query
> (<graph>).da:from da:select {?N1 <p1> ?N2}, {?N1 <p2> ?N2}.
> and when getting a nonempty graph the answer is "true"
> as simple as that!
What's your original graph and what's your subgraph, Jos?
I'm offering a graph with two nodes and no edges, plus the fact that an
edge of type either p1 or p2 must exist between the two encoded in some
higher-level semantic language.
I can only see four possible subgraphs of the original graph: one node,
the other node, both nodes, or neither node. None of these options
explicates the answer.
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 17:08:11 UTC