- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:07:07 -0500
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 16:05, Kendall Clark wrote: > Folks, > > I've checked in version 1.31 of the UC&R document. It's my best effort > to address the issues raised before, during, and since our F2F > meeting. Ah... I see you've done a non-trivial pass over the requirements... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#req There we find 10 requirements, 4.1 Multi-edged Paths thru 4.10 Result Limits. That seems to be a reasonable synthesis of the input from the WG. In the telcon tomorrow, I'll probably start by considering them in bulk: without excluding the possibility of adopting more requirements, shall we adopt all 10 of those requirements? I'll understand if I need to split the question, but it'll save time if I don't. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Monday, 3 May 2004 18:07:18 UTC