One of the things the comparison of query languages talks about is "safety". There is an interaction with remote access here - does the query language allow or encourage queries which do not terminate or incur excessive computation? In sending a query to a remote server, we should be aware we are sending around a computation. A query language that can cause infinite, or excessive, computation at the server is not a good idea. A query could be analysable as to be being safe or the language could be designed so that it is not possible, or probably not natural, to express unsafe constructs. I don't like the idea that "DAWG-QL" needs to be analysable; I would prefer that the language does not have features that allow excessive or infinite computation unless that feature is really important. This isn't a clear cut matter - if you ask a query that is not very selective of a large dataset, you will get back a lot of results and it may consume a lot of system resources. But we can design things to avoid traps for the application writer. Andy PS I like the phrase "RDQL is safe" which reminds me of the Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy: "mostly harmless". Not sure that translates to other parts of the globe.Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 08:16:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:26 UTC