- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:18:29 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I note that whenever someone proposes a use case that leans on disjunction, people say "you can solve that with this OWL ...". In doing so, they are assuming the ability to express a premise and assuming that the query engine suppors at least OWL inferencing. The former (premise) may be taken to be a requirement of DAWG-QL. Dependence on inference is specifically out of scope. If we use inference to solve certain use cases, how can we say that it is a DAWG use case? -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 08:18:32 UTC