public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2011 by date

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Henry Story

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment Gregory Williams
Re: Indirect Graph Identification Sandro Hawke
Re: Indirect Graph Identification Sandro Hawke

Monday, 28 November 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Eric Prud'hommeaux
Indirect Graph Identification James Leigh
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil

Sunday, 20 November 2011

Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL Michael Schneider

Friday, 18 November 2011

Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map Michael Schneider
Re: Re: LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime Michael Schneider
Re: sparql 1.1 Axel Polleres
sparql 1.1 허홍수

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument David Booth
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment Toby Inkster

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment Peter Ansell
SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment Toby Inkster
Re: Comments on Graph Store HTTP Protocol (20110512) Chime Ogbuji
Re: Implementation details of SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol Chime Ogbuji

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

RE: Aggregation w/o data? Bryan Thompson

Thursday, 10 November 2011

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML David Booth
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML Gregory Williams

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Re: Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example (with errors)) Steve Harris
Re: Aggregation w/o data? Steve Harris
ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME David Booth

Monday, 7 November 2011

Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02 Jeen Broekstra
Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02 Gregory Williams

Thursday, 3 November 2011

When is HAVING processed? Alex Miller

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument David Booth
Re: Blank Node Ordering James Leigh
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument Andy Seaborne
Re: Blank Node Ordering Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea Lee Feigenbaum
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Adrian Walker
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea Dave Beckett
Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly Lee Feigenbaum
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments David Booth
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea Lee Feigenbaum
Re: comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Last Call WD: builtin functions Andy Seaborne
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea Dave Beckett
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments Gregory Williams
Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly David Booth

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:48:57 UTC