public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from June 2010 by date

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Gregory Williams
• Re: possible erratum Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 28 June 2010

• possible erratum Robby Nevels

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

• Re: httpRange-14 as normative reference (and something on ISSUE-49) Chimezie Ogbuji

Thursday, 24 June 2010

• Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE Peter Ansell

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

• Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE Leigh Dodds

Tuesday, 22 June 2010

• Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE Peter Ansell
• Brief comment on sd:name Damian Steer

Thursday, 17 June 2010

• Further comments on SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol Rob Vesse

Tuesday, 15 June 2010

• Comment on SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol Rob Vesse

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 7 June 2010

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Leigh Dodds

Saturday, 5 June 2010

• Re: wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document Olaf Hartig
• Re: wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 4 June 2010

• wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document Olaf Hartig
• Re: IRI creation and encoding Ivan Mikhailov
• IRI creation and encoding Peter Ansell

Thursday, 3 June 2010

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Toby Inkster
• Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Michael Hausenblas

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2010 20:10:49 UTC