- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:32:06 +0200
- To: Gryff M <gryff88gryff@gmail.com>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dear Gryffin, thanks for reporting this. You are correct, this triple is missing from Example 26. This has actually already been spotted and is part of the Errata [1] of RDF 1.1. best [1] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata#erratum_4 On 27/03/2021 04:13, Gryff M wrote: > To be a syntactic sugar for the Example 25, as stated in the document, > the following line should be appended to the Example 26: > > _:b0 :p2 :q2 . > > Thanks, > Gryffin > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2021 12:36:22 UTC