- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:48:24 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>, W3C RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> Why is that different (if all syntaxes refer to the same graph) as > having such triples within the same serialization? I have a vague, probably poorly thought out, feeling that there might be a difference between explicit repetition in a single graph, such as :p a []. :p a []. which seems clearly intended to be two statements, and giving several representations of the same graph for the convenience of different consumers. Back when content-type negotiation was the way to do this, there was no problem because the scope was an HTTP transaction and there was no specified way to get two documents in a single transaction. Perhaps the best answer is to say that if you want to publish different versions of the same document, use the HTTP machinery, and do not try to embed them in a container. It’s easy to keep an HTTP connection open, making multiple requests doesn’t cost much. William Waites Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Informatics Forum 5.38, 10 Crichton St. Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 12:49:00 UTC