W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > January 2017


From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:03:41 +0100
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>, W3C RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2A4B1434-D4D4-4A0F-BB8F-307D5505E7BA@w3.org>
To: William Waites <ww@styx.org>

> On 23 Jan 2017, at 10:48, William Waites <ww@styx.org> wrote:
>> BNode identifiers refer to the same BNode, regardless of
>> which 'portion' they are in …
> It almost sounds as if you are about to invent an idea of scope,
> which one day might be allowed to nest…

I am not sure that is where I am heading at:-) What I am saying is that an HTML+RDFa+JSON-LD content would generate _one_ graph (just as HTML+RDFa generates _one_ graph). The rest could be seen as syntactic sugar, in fact…

That being said, I am not convinced that it is worth going down that route at the end. Recognizing, however, that a lambda user who may not have a deep understanding of the ins and outs of RDF may find himself/herself puzzled if, say, a namespace declaration in a @vocab element on HTML, or a node identified through _:B1234 is not working properly within the JSON-LD segment.


> William Waites
> Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science
> School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
> Informatics Forum 5.38, 10 Crichton St.
> Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 10:03:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:51 UTC