- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:49:41 -0700
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > >> New issues: >> >> s212–s214 (should include /ccc/) > > I don’t see that. Base <http://a/bb/ccc/..> has dot segments removed to yield <http://a/bb/>. Joining <g> yields <http://a/bb/c>. > >> s218 (should include /ccc/) > >> s220–s224 (should include /ccc/) >> s226–s230 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/) >> s238–s251 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/) > > Pretty much the same reasoning for all of these. As I read RFC3986, the trailing .. in the base disappears in the merging of the base and relative URIs (§5.2.3), before remove_dot_segments() is invoked. .greg
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 18:50:06 UTC