- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 20:23:20 -0500
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 02/28/2015 12:40 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 27/02/15 23:22, David Booth wrote: >> For whenever the next update is made . . . >> >> The N-Quads spec >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-n-quads-20140225/ >> should say up front that every N-Triples document is also an N-Quads >> document, rather than forcing the reader to guess or try to figure it >> out from comparing the two specifications. >> >> Similarly, the N-Triples spec should say that N-Triples is a subset of >> N-Quads. It already says that it is a subset of Turtle: >> "N-Triples is an easy to parse line-based subset of Turtle [TURTLE]." > > Slightly "devil's advocate" but while it is a subset by syntax, it is > not exactly a subset in all ways. > > When bytes are treated as N-Quads it means the default graph of a > dataset; as N-triples, it does not say that. That might be worth saying too. Thanks, David Booth
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2015 01:23:48 UTC