- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:01:20 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 20/07/15 23:06, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> (For SPARQL, W3C still officially controls and mediates additions to the SPARQL errata for example) > I’d like to see a similar process for SPARQL tests, which are in greater need of curation, IMO. Maybe a single RDF Test Platform CG could take this on for all existing RDF spects/test-suites. +1 Andy
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 13:01:52 UTC