- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:05:02 +0000
- To: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi, I somehow have come over some "evil" Turtle that seems to be on the form: <http://example.com/s2> <http://example.com/p> "false"^^ <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean> . (One word: PHP) Now, as bad style as this might look - I could not figure out from the RDF Turtle 1.1 grammar why it shouldn't be valid. http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#grammar-production-RDFLiteral [128s] RDFLiteral ::= String (LANGTAG | '^^' iri)? vs. [7] predicateObjectList ::= verb objectList (';' (verb objectList)?)* We "all know" that whitespace is allowed around ; - and not around ^^ - yet I can't see this reflected in these rules. Perhaps my grammar understanding is a bit rusty. http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-grammar-ws says: > White space (production WS) is used to separate two terminals which would otherwise be (mis-)recognized as one terminal. Rule names below in capitals indicate where white space is significant; these form a possible choice of terminals for constructing a Turtle parser. > White space is significant in the production String. Neither RDFLiteral or predicateObjectList are listed under Terminals. So there's a special WS production - but that's only used between [ ] - e.g. so you can do [ a foaf:Person ] #someone foaf:knows # Someone (else?) [ a foaf:Person ] . String is [17] String ::= STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_SINGLE_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_LONG_SINGLE_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_LONG_QUOTE Can anyone enlighten me? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 16:05:51 UTC