Fwd: bad link in SPARQL 1.1 document?

FYI.

Axel

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>
> Subject: Re: bad link in SPARQL 1.1 document?
> Date: 11 Nov 2014 08:52:16 GMT+1
> To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> 
> Good point. It appears to me though that this disambiguation page has been introduced after the SPARQL1.1 spec was finished (and the original link went to the 2004 version.
> From my point, I think that the disambiguation page at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ is wrong, it shouldn't have changed... particularly also because http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/ points to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/  in the "Previous version" link (which is kinda circular, isn't it?), so I think this comment should go to public-rdf-comments@w3.org... will forward it there in a separate mail to avoid cross-list replies.
> 
> best regards,
> Axel
> 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: @AxelPolleres
> 
> On 10 Nov 2014, at 17:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> In Section 18.3 of http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ there is a link to an undated version of the RDF semantics document, which currently goes to a disambiguation page.   This link should probably be changed to point to the appropriate version of the RDF semantics.
>> 
>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 07:53:00 UTC