- From: Evan Patton <pattoe@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:01:16 -0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Thank you for your response, Andy. It looks good to me. Evan On Feb 5, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > On 29/01/14 14:34, Evan W. Patton wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Production 6 of the N-Triples [1] grammar and production 7 of the >> N-Quads [2] grammar include '@' LANGTAG. The terminal LANGTAG also >> begins with '@'. Thus, specifying a language would require two @, making >> the examples in Sec 2.3 [3] of the N-Triples document invalid N-Triples >> / N-Quads. Furthermore, this also means that a valid N-Triples document >> containing language tags would not be valid Turtle document. The '@' >> sign in these two productions should be removed to bring them in line >> with production 128s of Turtle [4]. >> >> Evan >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#n-triples-grammar >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/n-quads/#sec-grammar >> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#sec-literals >> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-grammar-grammar > > Hi Evan, > > Thank you very much for the report. We have corrected the N-Triples and N-Quads documents to be the same as Turtle and in the same style. > > Rule 6: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/n-triples.html > > Rule 7: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/nquads/index.html > > Could you please respond to public-rdf-comments@w3.org to confirm that your comment has been dealt with satisfactorily? > > Andy > on behalf of the RDF-WG > > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 16:02:09 UTC