- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:13:33 +1100
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Stian, RDF-1.1 does not have the concept of plain literals [1]. Hence, it is difficult to map the OWL-WG-derived rdf:PlainLiteral set to RDF-1.1, if that is where you are coming at the issue from [2]. Cheers, Peter [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#section-Graph-Literal [2] https://github.com/owlcs/owlapi/issues/172 On 27 December 2014 at 16:37, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > In http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#canonical-ntriples I read: > >> Canonical N-Triples has the following additional constraints on layout: >> >> The whitespace following subject, predicate, and object MUST be a single space, (U+0020). All other locations that allow whitespace MUST be empty. >> There MUST be no comments. >> HEX MUST use only uppercase letters ([A-F]). >> Characters MUST NOT be represented by UCHAR. >> Within STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE, only the characters U+0022, U+005C, U+000A, U+000D are encoded using ECHAR. ECHAR MUST NOT be used for characters that are allowed directly in STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE. > > > and in http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#sec-parsing-terms > >> If neither a language tag nor a datatype IRI is provided, the literal has a datatype of xsd:string. > > > and in http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#sec-literals > >> If there is no datatype IRI and no language tag it is a simple literal and the datatype is http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string. > >> Example 3 >> <http://example.org/show/218> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "That Seventies Show"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> . # literal with XML Schema string datatype >> <http://example.org/show/218> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "That Seventies Show" . # same as above > > > So I am not any wiser with regards to how to serialize plain literals > in RDF 1.1 Canoical N-Triples.. > > > Are both of the two examples allowed in Canonical N-Triples? (it seems > so by the spec.. :-( ). > > Which variant should I generate? > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 >
Received on Saturday, 27 December 2014 23:14:00 UTC