Thursday, 31 October 2013
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
- Re: minor typo in Turtle CR
- Official response to ISSUE-168: blogPost vs. post (was JSON-LD spec question)
Monday, 28 October 2013
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
- Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145
- Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145
- Re: RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145
- RDF Semantics - datatypes and "identifies" vs "denotes" - ISSUE-145
Sunday, 27 October 2013
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
Friday, 25 October 2013
Thursday, 24 October 2013
- FYI: Transition Request for RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to CR
- [RESOLVED] Re: Your comments on RDF Semantics - ISSUE-159
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
Wednesday, 23 October 2013
- Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs?
- Re: Official response to ISSUE-164: @reverse algorithm is buggy
- [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" - ISSUE-147
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
- Official response to ISSUE-164: @reverse algorithm is buggy
- Fwd: Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-153: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
- Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
Tuesday, 22 October 2013
- JSON-LD implementation reports
- Updated EARL report for Ruby JSON-LD processor
- Updated JsonLD implementation report
- Re: RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
- Official response to ISSUE-162: Attempt to converge markup mechanisms for OData and JSON-LD
- Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
- Official response to RDF-ISSUE-153: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
- Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
Monday, 21 October 2013
- Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
Sunday, 20 October 2013
Saturday, 19 October 2013
Friday, 18 October 2013
- Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs?
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples
- Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs?
Wednesday, 16 October 2013
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Fwd: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
- Re: references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing)
- Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
- Re: N-Triples LC WD typos
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
Tuesday, 15 October 2013
- [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149)
- Response to ISSUE-159
Monday, 14 October 2013
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151)
Saturday, 12 October 2013
Friday, 11 October 2013
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151)
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
- Re: RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing (ISSUE-159)
Thursday, 10 October 2013
- Re: RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report
- Re: RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing
- RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing
Wednesday, 9 October 2013
- RDFLib plugin for JSON-LD implementation report
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149)
- RE: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD (RDF-ISSUE-153)
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
Saturday, 5 October 2013
Sunday, 6 October 2013
Friday, 4 October 2013
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
- Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
- Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource
Thursday, 3 October 2013
- Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146)
- Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents
- Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource
Wednesday, 2 October 2013
- JSON-LD implementation reports
- JsonLD implementation report
- Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts
- Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (ISSUE-149)
- Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146)
- Re: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource (ISSUE-148)
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (ISSUE-147)
- Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
- Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts (ISSUE-144)
- RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35
- RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
- RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
- procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics
- RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
- Re: Minor normative error in LC drafts
- Ruby JSON-LD implementation report