Gregg Kellogg wrote: > My reading of this rule, and the implementation of my own > parser, makes both versions legal. [...] > > Because the triplesBlock? is inside ('.' triplesBlock?) ? > this means that a trailing dot is fine, or a trailing dot > followed by another triplesBlock, or nothing at all. Damn. You're right. I wonder how I missed that? Sorry for the noise. RichardReceived on Sunday, 17 November 2013 22:07:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC