W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2013

Re: TriG examples not conforming to grammar

From: Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:06:57 +0000 (GMT)
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
cc: public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1311172204330.23626@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>
Gregg Kellogg wrote:

> My reading of this rule, and the implementation of my own 
> parser, makes both versions legal.  [...]
> Because the triplesBlock? is inside ('.' triplesBlock?) ? 
> this means that a trailing dot is fine, or a trailing dot 
> followed by another triplesBlock, or nothing at all.

Damn.  You're right.  I wonder how I missed that?

Sorry for the noise.

Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 22:07:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC