- From: Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:06:57 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- cc: public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> My reading of this rule, and the implementation of my own
> parser, makes both versions legal. [...]
>
> Because the triplesBlock? is inside ('.' triplesBlock?) ?
> this means that a trailing dot is fine, or a trailing dot
> followed by another triplesBlock, or nothing at all.
Damn. You're right. I wonder how I missed that?
Sorry for the noise.
Richard
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 22:07:21 UTC