W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Merging and improving the Turtle test suite(s)

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:27:17 -0500
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20131106152703.GE2752@w3.org>
I think this one was pretty non-controversial. In case it slipped
past, could you take a look and reply with "[RESOLVED]" if you agree?


* Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> [2013-03-26 00:43-0400]
> * Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> [2013-02-28 10:34-0500]
> … [eliding base url issues to be addressed in a separate sub-thread.]
> > 
> > Another issue I had in working with the test suite is that the comments in the Turtle files are sometimes misleading or simply wrong. Here are two examples I saw:
> > 
> > * Test turtle-syntax-bad-base-03 has the comment "BASE without URI", but seems to actually be testing if an error is thrown when a DOT is used after a "BASE <http://example/>".
> > 
> > * Test turtle-subm-27 has the wrong URI in the comment "In-scope base URI is http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/df1/tests/ at this point". Actual base URI at this point is probably <http://example/base/turtle-subm-27.ttl> (assuming my understanding of base URI resolution above is correct).
> 
> Tx for noticing those. I've updated accordingly.
>   <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/rev/b33c65104416>
> 
> If you are satisfied with the resolution of our free-form, beat poetry
> comments, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject.
> -- 
> -ericP

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 15:27:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:58 UTC