- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 12:39:06 -0800
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Greg, sorry for the late response on this issue. In March, you reported some issues on the Turtle Implementation Report [2]. In particular, you noted that the link to the mailing list (public-rdf-comments@w3.org) was broken and that the version of the EARL spec which was referenced was out of date. The referenced version of the EARL report is now [3], which is the latest version of that spec. These issues have been addressed, as you can see in the current Turtle Implementation Report [2]. Please tell us if this resolves your issues by responding to this mail with “[RESOLVED]” in the subject. Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/ > On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > > > I've posted EARL results for my turtle parser at: > > > > > http://kasei.us/code/rdf-trine/rdf-trine-turtle-2013-03-01.ttl > > > Also, I had two editorial comments about the implementation report page at: > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html > > > * The link to this mailing list soliciting implementation reports is broken. > > * The version of EARL that is linked to from the implementation report is a WD from 2007. The latest EARL WD from 2011 [1] makes substantive changes to the EARL vocabulary (e.g. earl:pass becomes earl:passed). It seems that the implementation report page is already using the new terms, but the reference should be updated to avoid confusion. > > thanks, > gregory williams > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/ >
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 20:39:32 UTC