public-rdf-comments@w3.org from November 2013 by date

Friday, 29 November 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk

Thursday, 28 November 2013

• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Peter Ansell
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of richard@cyganiak.de
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of john.goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk

Wednesday, 27 November 2013

• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Peter Ansell
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of gavin@carothers.name
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of lbolstad@opera.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of w3c_ac@joanneum.at
• Re: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Andy Seaborne

Monday, 25 November 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of rsingh@opengeospatial.org
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of Fabien.Gandon@inria.fr
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of art.barstow@nokia.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of mountie@paygate.net

Sunday, 24 November 2013

• [RESOLVED] Re: TriG compatibility with N-Quads Richard Smith
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of hiroyuki.aizu@toshiba.co.jp

Saturday, 23 November 2013

• Re: TriG compatibility with N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of jim.bell@hp.com

Friday, 22 November 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of kidehen@openlinksw.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of eric@semanticweb.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of bs3131@att.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of olszewsl@oclc.org
• Re: Bare collections in Turtle and TriG Andy Seaborne
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of mlvarez@w3.org
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of markus.gylling@gmail.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of glenn@skynav.com

Thursday, 21 November 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of raman@google.com
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of george.thomas1@hhs.gov

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

• Re: TriG compatibility with N-Quads Richard Smith
• [RESOLVED] Re: Awkward TriG compatibility with N3 Richard Smith
• Re: Awkward TriG compatibility with N3 Sandro Hawke
• Re: [RESOLVED] reminder: ack needed Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs Henry Story

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of singer@apple.com

Monday, 18 November 2013

• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Peter Ansell
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Dr. A. Joseph Rockmore
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• Re: TriG compatibility with N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• Re: Awkward TriG compatibility with N3 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Bare collections in Turtle and TriG Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 17 November 2013

• Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Peter Ansell
• Re: TriG examples not conforming to grammar Richard Smith
• Re: TriG examples not conforming to grammar Gregg Kellogg
• TriG compatibility with N-Quads Richard Smith
• Awkward TriG compatibility with N3 Richard Smith
• TriG examples not conforming to grammar Richard Smith
• Bare collections in Turtle and TriG Richard Smith
• Underspecification of prefixed names in Turtle Richard Smith

Thursday, 14 November 2013

• Error in RDF/JSON example 7 Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 10 November 2013

• New RDF 1.1 publications & request for implementer feedback Guus Schreiber
• [RESOLVED] Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski
• [RESOLVED] Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Alex Milowski

Thursday, 7 November 2013

• Re: comments on N-Quads, N-Triples and TriG CR (ISSUE-170, ISSUE-171, ISSUE-172) Guus Schreiber
• Re: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Peter Ansell
• Re: N-Quads backwards compatibility with respect to UTF-8/US-ASCII Peter Ansell
• N-Quads and N-Triples Candidate Recommendations and Normative links to RDF-1.1 Concepts Peter Ansell

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

• [RESOLVED] Re: [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments David Booth
• Re: [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [RESOLVED] Re: Merging and improving the Turtle test suite(s) Gregory Williams
• Re: [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments David Booth
• Re: Merging and improving the Turtle test suite(s) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples Gregory Williams
• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine Gregory Williams
• [RESOLVED] Re: Absolute URIs for Turtle tests Gregory Williams
• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle "coverage" test suite issues with N-Triples Gregory Williams
• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (ACTION-268) Gregory Williams

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle version naming? Jan Wielemaker

Monday, 4 November 2013

• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 Adrian Pohl

Sunday, 3 November 2013

• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (ACTION-268) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Turtle "coverage" test suite issues with N-Triples Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Absolute URIs for Turtle tests Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [RESOLVED] Re: Which characters are allowed in IRIREF in Turtle 2013? Dave Beckett
• [RESOLVED] Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013 Simon Reinhardt
• [RESOLVED] Re: Language-tagged strings in Turtle Simon Reinhardt
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 2 November 2013

• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Which characters are allowed in IRIREF in Turtle 2013? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Turtle tests blank ID patches, and EARL report for Serd Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Turtle version naming? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [RESOLVED] Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013 Dave Beckett
• Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 Simon Grant
• Re: Language-tagged strings in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Increased lookahead requirements in the Turtle draft Eric Prud'hommeaux

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2013 09:54:18 UTC