On 22 May 2013 03:00, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > This is an official response to a JSON-LD issue that you raised on > mandatory support for JSON-LD profiles on servers. Your issue has been > tracked here: > > https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/128 > > You were concerned that there could be interoperability issues if there > wasn't at least one mandatory JSON-LD profile that all servers and > clients were required to implement. > > You had suggested some specification text here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013May/0038.html > > The group discussed your proposal here: > > http://json-ld.org/minutes/2013-05-21/#topic-2 > > and resolved to accept the change here: > > http://json-ld.org/minutes/2013-05-21/#resolution-1 > > If you are happy with this resolution to ISSUE-128, please respond to > this e-mail and let the group know that you accept the changes. > Yes I accept the resolution. Thanks, PeterReceived on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:57:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC