On 18 May 2013 01:13, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi Damian, > > The RDF WG held substantial discussions regarding various designs for RDF > in JSON in the first half of 2011. The discussions are well documented both > in our mailing list and on our wiki. We decided roughly a year later > (May/June 2012) to proceed with JSON-LD due to the success of that > community group's activities and implementations. One might note that take > up of JSON-LD from third parties has been solid (e. g. Google's GMail > announcement yesterday). > > The only JSON item in our plate this late in the WG's charter is whether > to write a Note (not a Recommendation) on RDF/JSON. That's it. We will not > be accepting new design proposals at this time, although a future working > group might consider your proposal. > > Let me know when you are considering this and I can detail the quads extension to RDF/JSON which only adds one more, optional, step to the existing protocol. Hopefully that isn't too much of an extension for a Note, as I would like for the extension to be part of the standard and not just a Sesame-specific feature. Thanks, Peter
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 20:27:08 UTC