- From: Jan Wielemaker <J.Wielemaker@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 17:02:28 +0200
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 05/17/2013 04:35 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> P.s. still hoping for an >> @format <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/> . >> or similar. > > Jan, > > How do MIME types fit into the picture for you? Hi Andy, Well, in theory you can tell the format from the file extension or mimetype. In practice it doesn't work so well because of misinterpretations (e.g., people calling their Turtle file holding OWL data .owl, leaving the poor software to guess the format from the content) and poorly configured software (servers returning the wrong mimetype, clients uploading data using POST requests with the wrong mimetype). Besides, neither the extension nor the mimetype tells us which version of these formats we are dealing with. I'm sure this will eventually sort itself out as the old versions of these formats die away and everybody complies to the latest standard. That might take a while though :-( Also, nobody says this is the last revision of RDF serialization syntax. Adding a version indication to a file as well as something that helps recognizing the file from the content is pretty widespread practice. Cheers --- Jan
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 15:02:59 UTC