W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > May 2013

TriG being disjoint from Turtle

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 07:38:53 -0400
Message-ID: <519616CD.9030804@w3.org>
To: Jan Wielemaker <J.Wielemaker@vu.nl>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 05/17/2013 06:00 AM, Jan Wielemaker wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 11:49 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> [this fragment is from Charles Greer, not answered by Andy]
>> 1.  Could the spec be modified to allow TriG to be a superset of
>> turtle?  Specifically, could the production rules be modified to allow
>> a set of triples outside of any '{'  '}' to be the same as triples in a
>> default anonymous graph?  It seems that even now, the rules allow
>> multiple anonymous graph productions, whose union would be the unnamed
>> graph.  It would be convenient if we could dispense with these anonymous
>> curly braces altogether if possible.
> Having implemented TriG yesterday on top of the Turtle parser, I must 
> say that I was happily surprised that TriG does not allow for triples
> outside {}.  This means you can detect whether a document is a Turtle
> or TriG document at the first triple.

Why do you want to do that?      I'm imagining a world where people load 
data by URL, not necessarily knowing if it's going to have named graphs 
in it.

I'd think in a load_graph operation, you'd accept TriG as well, using 
the default graph as the output graph.   Maybe have a flag about whether 
to ignore or raise on error if there are some named graphs as well.

And in a load_dataset operations, I'd think you'd accept Turtle as well, 
and just not get any named graphs out of it.

      -- Sandro
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 11:39:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:33 UTC