- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:49:33 +0100
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 15/05/13 17:36, Charles Greer wrote: > Hi all, > > Looking at the editor's draft of TriG a couple of questions occur to us > at MarkLogic. > > 1. Could the spec be modified to allow TriG to be a superset of > turtle? Specifically, could the production rules be modified to allow > a set of triples outside of any '{' '}' to be the same as triples in a > default anonymous graph? It seems that even now, the rules allow > multiple anonymous graph productions, whose union would be the unnamed > graph. It would be convenient if we could dispense with these anonymous > curly braces altogether if possible. > > 2. The first two production rules > [1g] |trigDoc| ::= graph_statement > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/index.html#grammar-production-graph_statement>|*| > > [2g] |graph_statement| ::= directive > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/index.html#grammar-production-directive> > || | graph > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/index.html#grammar-production-graph> > > > > permit @prefix statements et. al. to be anywhere in the document. I > don't have any issue with that, but it was a little surprising to me, as > these always seemed like header information to me, and it seems as > though it might be harder to implement this way. > > Charles (not an official response) This applies in in Turtle as well - prefixes can come between any '[6] triples' block. I hope it's clear that the directive applies from that point in the document onwards, not to the whole document. In implementation terms, parsing is streaming. == Example 1 1. { :x :p 123 . } 2. @prefix : <http://example/ns#> . is illegal because ":" isn't defined at line 1. == Example 2 1. @prefix : <http://example/nsX#> . 2. { :x :p 123 . } 3. @prefix : <http://example/nsY#> . 4. { :x :p 123 . } is two different triples. If you find the document not to be clear, please could you make a formal comment? (Whether it's good style to do this is another matter) Andy > > -- > Charles Greer > Senior Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > charles.greer@marklogic.com > Phone: +1 707 408 3277 > www.marklogic.com >
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 09:50:12 UTC