- From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:44:24 -0400
- To: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi all, After reading over the current draft[1] I felt some clarification was appropriate when introducing datasets. Graphs are clearly presented as immutable, but when datasets are introduces in section 1.6 their relationships to graphs are not clear. Below are my notes. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html In section 1.6 Working with Multiple RDF Graphs, I suggest the relationship between datasets and graph be clarified. Particularly wrt temporal changes. Perhaps the following might be better. An RDF dataset is a collection of RDF graphs. All but [at most] one of these graphs have [at least one] associated IRI. They are called named graphs, and the IRI is called the graph name. [One of the graphs is called the default graph of the RDF dataset and might] not have an associated IRI. [The graph name can be associated with at most one graph at a time, but that associated graph may change over time. The dataset's collection of graphs and associated IRIs may also change over time]. In section 3.3 Literals, the regex expressions include an '@' prefix, however, the spec never mentions what this '@' is for nor do language tags support an '@' at all. ;) In section 5.5 The Value Corresponding to a Literal, It says they "MUST accept ill-typed literals". I believe that should be changes to "SHOULD accept ill-typed literals", since earlier it says they SHOULD NOT reject them. Regards, James
Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 13:44:51 UTC