public-rdf-comments@w3.org from May 2013 by date

Friday, 31 May 2013

• RE: Format of fragment identifier Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Format of fragment identifier Hans Teijgeler
• RE: Format of fragment identifier Markus Lanthaler
• RE: RDF 1.1 - Skolem IRI Hans Teijgeler
• Re: RDF 1.1 - Skolem IRI Pat Hayes
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Gavin Carothers
• RE: GLD WG feedback on JSON-LD and API // RDF-ISSUE-135 Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Markus Lanthaler
• RE: RDF 1.1 - Skolem IRI Markus Lanthaler
• RE: RDF 1.1 - Skolem IRI Hans Teijgeler
• RDF 1.1 - Skolem IRI Hans Teijgeler
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Gavin Carothers
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth

Thursday, 30 May 2013

• Re: GLD WG feedback on JSON-LD and API John Erickson
• GLD WG feedback on JSON-LD and API Marios Meimaris

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Peter Occil
• Re: reification (editorial) Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: reification (editorial) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Turtle data-type Kingsley Idehen
• Re: reification (editorial) David Wood
• reification (editorial) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Turtle data-type Sandro Hawke
• Re: Turtle data-type Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Turtle data-type Henry Story
• Re: Turtle data-type Peter Ansell
• Re: Turtle data-type Henry Story
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

• RE: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Turtle data-type Kingsley Idehen

Monday, 27 May 2013

• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth

Sunday, 26 May 2013

• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Turtle version proposal Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth
• Turtle version proposal David Booth
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Turtle data-type Henry Story
• Re: Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-Quads TR Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: N-Quads TR Henry Story
• N-Quads TR Andreas Harth
• Turtle syntax: Please align base URI with RFC 3986 & 3987 David Booth

Saturday, 25 May 2013

• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Kingsley Idehen
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle David Booth

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Peter Ansell
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 21 May 2013

• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-132: JSON-LD/RDF Alignment Peter Ansell
• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-128: JSON-LD Mandatory Profiles Peter Ansell
• Re: API for loading datasets; was Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-132: JSON-LD/RDF Alignment Manu Sporny
• Updated EARL rollup and implementation list Gregg Kellogg
• Re: API for loading datasets; was Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Charles Greer
• API for loading datasets; was Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• How to distinguish among Turtle family members; was Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-128: JSON-LD Mandatory Profiles Manu Sporny
• moving toward N3; was Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Updated processor report for RDF.rb RDF::Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: My new Turtle RDF parser for Java Gregg Kellogg
• Re: EARL Report for Green Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: EARL Report for Green Turtle Alex Milowski
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax David Booth
• Apache Jena EARL report for Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: EARL Report for Green Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Fw: My new Turtle RDF parser for Java Peter Occil
• Re: EARL Report for Green Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• EARL Report for Green Turtle Alex Milowski

Monday, 20 May 2013

• Re: [RESOLVED] Re: \u0000 in literals? Gavin Carothers
• [RESOLVED] Re: \u0000 in literals? Alex Milowski
• Re: \u0000 in literals? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: \u0000 in literals? David Booth
• Re: \u0000 in literals? David Booth
• Re: \u0000 in literals? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• \u0000 in literals? Alex Milowski
• Turtle data-type Henry Story
• [RESOLVED] Re: Test turtle-syntax-bad-struct-07 - blank nodes in predicates Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions David Booth
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions Pat Hayes
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Markus Lanthaler

Sunday, 19 May 2013

• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test turtle-syntax-bad-struct-07 - blank nodes in predicates Alex Milowski
• Re: Test turtle-syntax-bad-struct-07 - blank nodes in predicates Alex Milowski
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Andy Seaborne
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Henry Story
• Re: Test turtle-syntax-bad-struct-07 - blank nodes in predicates Gregg Kellogg
• Test turtle-syntax-bad-struct-07 - blank nodes in predicates Alex Milowski
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Peter Ansell
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 / RDF-ISSUE-128 and RDF-ISSUE-129 Markus Lanthaler

Saturday, 18 May 2013

• RE: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Tristan King
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Peter Ansell
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Andy Seaborne
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Henry Story
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions Richard Cyganiak
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Henry Story
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Niklas Lindström
• RE: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions David Booth
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions Sandro Hawke
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Tristan King
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions Richard Cyganiak
• Re: JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Signal for semantic extensions David Booth

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML David Wood
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Peter Occil
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Peter Occil
• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML Peter Ansell
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski
• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML Damian Gessler
• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML Damian Gessler
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Jan Wielemaker
• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML David Wood
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Jan Wielemaker
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Richard Cyganiak
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Jan Wielemaker
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Peter Ansell
• Re: TriG being disjoint from Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• TriG being disjoint from Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML Peter Ansell
• JSONLD-Java Implementation Report Tristan King

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Public feedback on RDF/JSON: Proposal to align w/ W3C RDF/XML Damian Gessler

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: TriG production questions Jan Wielemaker
• Re: TriG production questions Andy Seaborne
• Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle David Booth
• rE: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Clarifying Temporal Datasets James Leigh
• Re: Clarifying Temporal Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle David Booth
• Re: Clarifying Temporal Datasets James Leigh
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Andy Seaborne
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Jan Wielemaker
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Clarifying Temporal Datasets Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

• TriG production questions Charles Greer

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Alex Milowski
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Sandro Hawke
• PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Gavin Carothers
• Re: Clarifying Temporal Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

• Collection / Grammar Issue Alex Milowski

Monday, 13 May 2013

• Clarifying Temporal Datasets James Leigh
• Re: JSON-LD Last Call responses from GLD Manu Sporny

Friday, 10 May 2013

• suggested test cases for turtle comments Jeremy J Carroll

Thursday, 9 May 2013

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange Gregg Kellogg
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-125: Use Futures in the JSON-LD API Tab Atkins Jr.
• JSON-LD Last Call responses from GLD Hadley Beeman
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-125: Use Futures in the JSON-LD API Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange Peter Ansell

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

• Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-124 (order-of-parameters) by Boris Zbarsky Boris Zbarsky
• Official response to RDF-ISSUE-124 (order-of-parameters) by Boris Zbarsky Manu Sporny
• [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments David Booth
• Re: API updated to use Futures - request for review Marcos Caceres
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange Markus Lanthaler
• JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange Peter Ansell

Monday, 6 May 2013

• RE: API updated to use Futures - request for review Markus Lanthaler

Sunday, 5 May 2013

• Re: API updated to use Futures - request for review Marcos Caceres
• API updated to use Futures - request for review Markus Lanthaler

Saturday, 4 May 2013

• Re: rdf:Statement and graphs Peter Ansell
• Re: rdf:Statement and graphs Bo Ferri
• Re: rdf:Statement and graphs Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC
• Re: rdf:Statement and graphs Henry Story

Friday, 3 May 2013

• Re: rdf:Statement and graphs Kingsley Idehen
• rdf:Statement and graphs Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC
• RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Markus Lanthaler
• RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Stian Soiland-Reyes
• RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Markus Lanthaler

Thursday, 2 May 2013

• Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Peter Ansell
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON David Booth
• Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Gregg Kellogg
• RE: JSON-LD: Please keep @base Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Kingsley Idehen
• JSON-LD: Please keep @base Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Peter Ansell
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Martin Nally
• Fwd: Fwd: RDF/JSON Martin Nally
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Dave Longley
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Peter Ansell
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON Dave Longley

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2013 20:48:14 UTC