- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:16:22 +0000
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 24/03/13 00:06, Peter Ansell wrote: > On 24 March 2013 08:38, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote: >> I reviewed the Turtle 2013 doc and the test suite hanging out in mercurial a >> few weeks ago at >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/ >> I'm still not clear if these define conformance; I asked about this in >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0026.html >> >> I've got some tests I made for raptor after the original Turtle submission >> that the WG might want to use. I give permission for them to be used >> under the W3C software license >> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 (unofficial; just trying to speed things up) I think the plan is to dual license the test suite - the W3C software license and the W3C Test Suite license. The test suite license does not permit modification (which is kind of natural - the test suite is supposed to be a fixed reference point). So it is not an open source license [2] (no right to modify). Being dual licensed, you can take it and modify it under the software license which is an open source license. Does that work for you? [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-license.html [2] http://opensource.org/osd >> >> This is what they test: >> test-33.ttl - \\ at end of """ >> test-35.ttl - what are rules for "foo"@lang^^uri ? >> test-36.ttl - check for greedy lexers >> test-37.ttl - long literal with lang tag >> test-38.ttl - unicode surrogates ok or not >> >> test-35 is not strictly legal but I had to decide what to do; I dropped >> the language. > > In RDF-1.1 if the type uri was rdf:langString I would expect the > language could be preserved. As the Turtle grammar is currently defined in LC, the syntax for literal had either a @lang xor a ^^datatype. [128s] RDFLiteral ::= String (LANGTAG | '^^' iri)? The fact that in the data model there is a fixed datatype for a @lang is not reflected in the grammar. Andy > > Peter >
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 11:16:55 UTC